Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Austin, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lualhati, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Statistical Conclusion Validity for Organizational Science Researchers: A Review

James T. Austin

The Ohio State University, austin.38{at}osu.edu

Kristin A. Boyle

Georgia Institute of Technology

Joselito C. Lualhati

Lucent Technologies

Statistical conclusion validity is concerned with an integrated evaluation of statistical power, significance testing, and effect size. A lack of attention to the integrated argument occurs because of an emphasis on significance testing, a lack of knowledge, and a lack of motivation. This article has three objectives. First, the central logic of the statistical conclusion validity argument is explained. Following that, issues relating to the three components are reviewed. These issues include computations, multivariate extensions, and recommendations for practice. Increasing use of model-testing procedures in which the goal of the analysis is not to reject the null hypothesis is noted. Finally, conclusions are offered and research needs are discussed.

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 1, No. 2, 164-208 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/109442819812002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
C. A. Scherbaum and J. M. Ferreter
Estimating Statistical Power and Required Sample Sizes for Organizational Research Using Multilevel Modeling
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 347 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
J. P. Wanous, A. E. Reichers, and J. T. Austin
Cynicism about Organizational Change: Measurement, Antecedents, and Correlates
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2000; 25(2): 132 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]