Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meade, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lautenschlager, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Are Internet and Paper-and-Pencil Personality Tests Truly Comparable?

An Experimental Design Measurement Invariance Study

Adam W. Meade

North Carolina State University, awmeade{at}ncsu.edu

Lawrence C. Michels

University of Georgia

Gary J. Lautenschlager

University of Georgia

Recently, the use of technology in assessment for personnel selection has increased dramatically. An important consideration is whether test scores obtained via Internet administration are psychometrically equivalent to those obtained by the more traditional paper-and-pencil format. Our results suggest that there is comparability of scores for many personality constructs, including conscientiousness. However, invariance was not found for some scales between persons allowed to choose formats and those not given a choice of formats. As testing-format preference may be related to membership in federally protected demographic groups, this latter finding was somewhat troubling. Additionally, we illustrate the use of an experimental laboratory design to investigate possible causes of a lack of measurement invariance in Internet and paper-and-pencil comparisons.

Key Words: online testing • internet testing • online assessment • measurement invariance • measurement equivalence • factorial invariance

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 10, No. 2, 322-345 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428106289393


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career DevelopmentHome page
T. S. Behrend, L. Foster Thompson, A. W. Meade, D. A. Newton, and M. S. Grayson
Measurement Invariance in Careers Research: Using IRT to Study Gender Differences in Medical Students' Specialization Decisions
Journal of Career Development, September 1, 2008; 35(1): 60 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Applied Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. J. Lautenschlager and A. W. Meade
AlphaTest: A Windows Program for Tests of Hypotheses About Coefficient Alpha
Applied Psychological Measurement, September 1, 2008; 32(6): 502 - 503.
[PDF]