Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1094428106295496v1
1094428106295496v2
11/3/541    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karra, N.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Researching "Back Home"

International Management Research as Autoethnography

Neri Karra

London School of Economics

Nelson Phillips

Imperial College London

The challenges facing international management researchers conducting research in foreign contexts are increasingly well understood. However, for a growing group of researchers, the problem is very different: Rather than being foreign researchers researching in an unfamiliar context, they are insiders conducting research in their own cultural context for publication in international journals. In this article, the authors draw on their own experiences and on the literature on autoethnography to illustrate the strengths and challenges of researching "back home." In particular, they argue that autoethnographic approaches have four important strengths— ease of access, reduced resource requirements, ease of establishing trust and rapport, and reduced problems with translation—but at the same time pose three important challenges— lack of critical distance, role conflict, and the limits of serendipity.

Key Words: field research methods • case study • ethnography • interviews • participant observation

This version was published on July 1, 2008

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 11, No. 3, 541-561 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428106295496


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
LeadershipHome page
A. Bryman and S. Lilley
Leadership Researchers on Leadership in Higher Education
Leadership, August 1, 2009; 5(3): 331 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]