Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1094428107308897v1
11/4/682    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keegan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kabanoff, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Indirect Industry-and Subindustry-Level Managerial Discretion Measurement

Jack Keegan

Queensland University of Technology

Boris Kabanoff

Queensland University of Technology

Hambrick and Finkelstein's managerial discretion model has received limited research attention, partly because managerial discretion is difficult to operationalize. Abrahamson and Hambrick measured attentional homogeneity, ``the degree of similarity of foci of attention of managers in an industry,'' and demonstrated that it is strongly and negatively correlated with industry-level discretion (ILD). The authors measure attentional homogeneity more accurately and elegantly and show that attentional heterogeneity, the negative of attentional homogeneity, is a viable operationalization of ILD. They extend the technique and measure average levels of managerial discretion for subindustry groups and, using debt discipline as their example, demonstrate the contextual effects of ILD and show that discretion determinants can have nonlinear interactions.

Key Words: industry-level discretion • attentional heterogeneity • lexical measures • positively adjusted accounts • debt discipline • discretionary accounts adjustments • exploratory factor analysis confidence intervals

This version was published on October 1, 2008

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 11, No. 4, 682-694 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107308897


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
D. J. Ketchen Jr, B. K. Boyd, and D. D. Bergh
Research Methodology in Strategic Management: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 643 - 658.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
N. Venkat Venkatraman
Advancing Strategic Management Insights: Why Attention to Methods and Measurement Matters
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 790 - 794.
[Abstract] [PDF]