| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
How Do Missing Data Bias Estimates of Within-Group Agreement? Sensitivity of SD WG, CVWG, rWG(J), rWG(J) * , and ICC to Systematic NonresponseTexas A&M University, College Station, d5n{at}tamu.edu
Michigan State University, East Lansing In multilevel theory testing, estimation of group-level properties (i.e., consensus and diversity) is often complicated by missing data. Researchers are left to draw inferences about group constructs (e.g., organizational climate and climate strength) from the responses of only a subset of group members. This study analyzes the biasing impact of random and non-random missingness patterns on within-group agreement and reliability (standard deviation, coefficient of variation, rWG(J), r*WG(J), ADM, aWG , and intraclass correlation) across a range of response rates, numbers of items, and systematic missing data mechanisms. Results demonstrate biases up to 20% over- or underestimation for common response rates found in organizational research. Correction formulae are presented, which enable assessment of the sensitivity of multilevel results to survey nonresponse.
Key Words: multilevel analysis group agreement aggregation missing data
This version was published on January
1, 2009 Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 12, No. 1,
113-147 (2009) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||