Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1094428107310091v1
12/1/63    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Multiple-Perspective Approach to Data Analysis in Congruence Research

Gordon W. Cheung

Department of Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, gordonc{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Despite the popularity of the congruence construct (similarity, fit, and agreement) in organizational theories, the operationalization of congruence and the appropriate methods to analyze it have concerned many researchers. A structural equation modeling-based latent congruence model (LCM) that operationalizes congruence as the mean and difference of the component measures has recently been introduced. The LCM provides a simple analytical framework for examining the measurement equivalence of the component measures and for conducting congruence analysis and component analysis. The objective of this note is to highlight the similarities and differences between the LCM and the polynomial regression (PR) approach to studying congruence. The major difference is that the LCM considers congruence and its components as distinctive constructs, and therefore they can be used to answer different research questions. The determination of which constructs and analytical approach to use should be based on the theory and research hypotheses that answer the research question. Indeed, because LCM provides a simple framework for both congruence analysis and component analysis, researchers are encouraged to answer their research questions from both perspectives.

Key Words: data analysis • latent congruence model • component analysis • polynomial regression

This version was published on January 1, 2009

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 12, No. 1, 63-68 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107310091


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?