Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1094428107309312v1
12/2/211    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bedeian, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hyman, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Editorial

Scientific Achievement and Editorial Board Membership

Arthur G. Bedeian

Louisiana State University, abede{at}lsu.edu

David D. Van Fleet

Arizona State University

Hugh H. Hyman, III

Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals

A cornerstone of the scientific ethos is that editorial board members should be selected based on their scholarly achievements, as demonstrated by publications in peer-reviewed journals and evidence that their work is of value to others in their disciplines. To discern if this reasoning is applied in practice, this study examined the scholarly records of the editorial boards of premier peer-reviewed journals sponsored by the leading professional associations in management and six related disciplines.

Key Words: bibiliometrics • infometrics • philosophy of science • scientific ethos • scientometrics

This version was published on April 1, 2009

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 12, No. 2, 211-238 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107309312
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Management LearningHome page
C. Prichard
Review: The Black Box of Journal Editorship Still Needs Opening: Opening the Black Box of Editorship YEHUNDA BARUCH, ALISON KONRAD, HERMAN AGUINIS, AND WILLIAM STARBUCK. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. 296 pp. {pound}55.00 (hbk). ISBN 9780230013605
Management Learning, November 1, 2009; 40(5): 631 - 636.
[PDF]

Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. Klimoski
Begin the Journey With the End in Mind
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. G. Bedeian, D. D. Van Fleet, and H. H. Hyman III
``Circle the Wagons and Defend the Faith'': Slicing and Dicing the Data
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 276 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]