Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1094428108315872v1
12/2/253    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hitt, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Editorial

Editorial Judgments, Quality Scholarship, and the Academy of Management's Journals

Michael A. Hitt

Texas A&M University

Bedeian, Van Fleet, and Hyman's article offers a critical examination of the scholarly achievements of editorial review board members for several scholarly journals in related disciplines, including the Academy of Management's primary scholarly journals, the Academy of Management Review and the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ). The author finds their critique to be interesting and thorough in many ways. However, this commentary examines several issues related to their critique, including the methodology, criteria for and process of selecting editorial review board members, the editor's role in the evaluation of work submitted to journals, and the performance of scholarly journals. Consideration of these issues allows a broader and more complete view of scholarly publishing, leading to some different conclusions.

Key Words: editorial judgments • editorial review board members • journal impact • scholarly productivity

This version was published on April 1, 2009

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 12, No. 2, 253-258 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428108315872
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. Klimoski
Begin the Journey With the End in Mind
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. G. Bedeian, D. D. Van Fleet, and H. H. Hyman III
``Circle the Wagons and Defend the Faith'': Slicing and Dicing the Data
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 276 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]