This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1094428107300396v1 12/3/554    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Highhouse, S. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Designing Experiments That Generalize

Bowling Green State University, shighho{at}bgnet.bgsu.edu

Organizational research has relied too heavily on methods characterized by passive observation, likely because there is a widespread belief that experimental research has limited generalizability. However, this is often because researchers (and reviewers or editors) misunderstand the nature of generalizability and what it requires. This article reiterates the importance of experimental research for understanding organizational phenomena and separates the legitimate concerns about experimental generalizability from the irrelevant ones. Whereas most criticisms of experiments focus on sample characteristics and mundane realism (i.e., superficial resemblance to the real world), more attention needs to be paid to the degree to which the treatment manipulation is valid, representative, and strong.

Key Words: experimental design • generalizability • construct validity • stimulus sampling

This version was published on July 1, 2009

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 12, No. 3, 554-566 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107300396


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?