Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burke, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dusig, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement

Michael J. Burke

Tulane University

Lisa M. Finkelstein

Northern Illinois University

Michelle S. Dusig

Tulane University

In this investigation, the authors report the results of two studies designed to investigate the efficacy of two proposed indices of interrater agreement based on average deviations from the mean and from the median (ADM and ADMd, respectively). Using survey response data collected from 6,549 sales employees in 119 stores of a national retail company, Study 1 compared the results of six interrater agreement indices across four types of Likert-type response scales (i.e., 5-, 6-, 7-, and 11-point scales). The results indicated that the AD indices were highly correlated with an index of proportional agreement and with within-group interrater agreement indices. Study 2, based on survey data collected from 4,158 sales employees in 109 other stores of this company, constructively replicated Study 1 and examined the consistency of interrater agreement decisions across six indices with respect to a priori decision rules. Study 2 results also supported the use of AD indices. Practical issues concerning the use of AD indices for estimating interrater agreement and future research directions are discussed.

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 2, No. 1, 49-68 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/109442819921004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic and Industrial DemocracyHome page
N. de Cuyper, B. Sora, H. de Witte, A. Caballer, and J. M. Peiro
Organizations' Use of Temporary Employment and a Climate of Job Insecurity among Belgian and Spanish Permanent Workers
Economic and Industrial Democracy, November 1, 2009; 30(4): 564 - 591.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
X. Dumay
Origins and Consequences of Schools' Organizational Culture for Student Achievement
Educational Administration Quarterly, October 1, 2009; 45(4): 523 - 555.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
O. Ludtke and A. Robitzsch
Assessing Within-Group Agreement: A Critical Examination of a Random-Group Resampling Approach
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2009; 12(3): 461 - 487.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. Cohen, E. Doveh, and I. Nahum-Shani
Testing Agreement for Multi-Item Scales With the IndicesrWG(J) and AD M(J)
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2009; 12(1): 148 - 164.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
D. A. Newman and H.-P. Sin
How Do Missing Data Bias Estimates of Within-Group Agreement? Sensitivity of SD WG, CVWG, rWG(J), rWG(J) * , and ICC to Systematic Nonresponse
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2009; 12(1): 113 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
J. M. LeBreton and J. L. Senter
Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2008; 11(4): 815 - 852.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Q. M. Roberson, M. C. Sturman, and T. L. Simons
Does the Measure of Dispersion Matter in Multilevel Research? A Comparison of the Relative Performance of Dispersion Indexes
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2007; 10(4): 564 - 588.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
A. W. Meade and L. T. Eby
Using Indices of Group Agreement in Multilevel Construct Validation
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2007; 10(1): 75 - 96.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. D. Brown and N. M. A. Hauenstein
Interrater Agreement Reconsidered: An Alternative to the rwg Indices
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2005; 8(2): 165 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
M. J. Burke and W. P. Dunlap
Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User's Guide
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2002; 5(2): 159 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]