|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
On Average Deviation Indices for Estimating Interrater Agreement
Michael J. Burke
Tulane University
Lisa M. Finkelstein
Northern Illinois University
Michelle S. Dusig
Tulane University
In this investigation, the authors report the results of two studies designed to investigate the efficacy of two proposed indices of interrater agreement based on average deviations from the mean and from the median (ADM and ADMd, respectively). Using survey response data collected from 6,549 sales employees in 119 stores of a national retail company, Study 1 compared the results of six interrater agreement indices across four types of Likert-type response scales (i.e., 5-, 6-, 7-, and 11-point scales). The results indicated that the AD indices were highly correlated with an index of proportional agreement and with within-group interrater agreement indices. Study 2, based on survey data collected from 4,158 sales employees in 109 other stores of this company, constructively replicated Study 1 and examined the consistency of interrater agreement decisions across six indices with respect to a priori decision rules. Study 2 results also supported the use of AD indices. Practical issues concerning the use of AD indices for estimating interrater agreement and future research directions are discussed.
Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 2, No. 1,
49-68 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/109442819921004

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. de Cuyper, B. Sora, H. de Witte, A. Caballer, and J. M. Peiro
Organizations' Use of Temporary Employment and a Climate of Job Insecurity among Belgian and Spanish Permanent Workers
Economic and Industrial Democracy,
November 1, 2009;
30(4):
564 - 591.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Dumay
Origins and Consequences of Schools' Organizational Culture for Student Achievement
Educational Administration Quarterly,
October 1, 2009;
45(4):
523 - 555.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Ludtke and A. Robitzsch
Assessing Within-Group Agreement: A Critical Examination of a Random-Group Resampling Approach
Organizational Research Methods,
July 1, 2009;
12(3):
461 - 487.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cohen, E. Doveh, and I. Nahum-Shani
Testing Agreement for Multi-Item Scales With the IndicesrWG(J) and AD M(J)
Organizational Research Methods,
January 1, 2009;
12(1):
148 - 164.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Newman and H.-P. Sin
How Do Missing Data Bias Estimates of Within-Group Agreement? Sensitivity of SD WG, CVWG, rWG(J), rWG(J) * , and ICC to Systematic Nonresponse
Organizational Research Methods,
January 1, 2009;
12(1):
113 - 147.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. LeBreton and J. L. Senter
Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement
Organizational Research Methods,
October 1, 2008;
11(4):
815 - 852.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. M. Roberson, M. C. Sturman, and T. L. Simons
Does the Measure of Dispersion Matter in Multilevel Research? A Comparison of the Relative Performance of Dispersion Indexes
Organizational Research Methods,
October 1, 2007;
10(4):
564 - 588.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Meade and L. T. Eby
Using Indices of Group Agreement in Multilevel Construct Validation
Organizational Research Methods,
January 1, 2007;
10(1):
75 - 96.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Brown and N. M. A. Hauenstein
Interrater Agreement Reconsidered: An Alternative to the rwg Indices
Organizational Research Methods,
April 1, 2005;
8(2):
165 - 184.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Burke and W. P. Dunlap
Estimating Interrater Agreement with the Average Deviation Index: A User's Guide
Organizational Research Methods,
April 1, 2002;
5(2):
159 - 172.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|