Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Currall, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Doniger, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies to Study Group Processes:An Illustrative Study of Acorporate Board of Directors

Steven C. Currall

Rice University

Tove Helland Hammer

Cornell University

L. Scott Baggett

Glen M. Doniger

Rice University

In this demonstration article, the authors explain procedures for combining the richness of detail that is characteristic of qualitative data collection with the hypothesis testing advantage of statistical inference techniques. Qualitative data came from a 5-year participant observation study of a corporate board of directors. Quantification of the participant observer’s qualitative field notes was achieved by using content analysis to code directors’ verbal behaviors. Based on counts of directors’ verbal behaviors, the authors tested illustrative hypotheses concerning group process within the board. Univariate (Cox-Stuart’s test of trend), bivariate (Kendall’s nonparametric correlation), and multivariate (log Poisson regression with post hoc contrasts) analyses were conducted. The study’s use of qualitative and quantitative information promoted both "discovery" (i.e., theory development) and "justification" (i.e., theory evaluation) and facilitated a "discovery-justification-discovery cycle" that was particularly useful for understanding group processes with the corporate board.

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 2, No. 1, 5-36 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/109442819921002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
H. H. M. Tse and M. T. Dasborough
A Study of Exchange and Emotions in Team Member Relationships
Group Organization Management, April 1, 2008; 33(2): 194 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
OrganizationHome page
J. W. Cox and J. Hassard
Triangulation in Organizational Research: A Re-Presentation
Organization, January 1, 2005; 12(1): 109 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
R. J. Torraco
Research Methods for Theory Building in Applied Disciplines: A Comparative Analysis
Advances in Developing Human Resources, August 1, 2002; 4(3): 355 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]