Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Switzer, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Missing Data in Multiple Item Scales: A Monte Carlo Analysis of Missing Data Techniques

Philip L. Roth

Fred S. Switzer, III

Deborah M. Switzer

Clemson University

Researchers in many fields use multiple item scales to measure important variables such as attitudes and personality traits, but find that some respondents failed to complete certain items. Past missing data research focuses on missing entire instruments, and is of limited help because there are few variables to help impute missing scores and the variables are often not highly related to each other. Multiple item scales offer the unique opportunity to impute missing values from other correlated items designed to measure the same construct. A Monte Carlo analysis was conducted to compare several missing data techniques. The techniques included listwise deletion, regression imputation, hot-deck imputation, and two forms of mean substitution. Results suggest that regression imputation and substituting the mean response of a person to other items on a scale are very promising approaches. Furthermore, the imputation techniques often outperformed listwise deletion.

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 2, No. 3, 211-232 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/109442819923001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
J. Gooty, M. Gavin, P. D. Johnson, M. L. Frazier, and D. B. Snow
In the Eyes of the Beholder: Transformational Leadership, Positive Psychological Capital, and Performance
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, May 1, 2009; 15(4): 353 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
D. A. Newman and H.-P. Sin
How Do Missing Data Bias Estimates of Within-Group Agreement? Sensitivity of SD WG, CVWG, rWG(J), rWG(J) * , and ICC to Systematic Nonresponse
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2009; 12(1): 113 - 147.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
TraumatologyHome page
J. C. Spilsbury, K. E. Fletcher, R. Creeden, and S. Friedman
Psychometric Properties of the Dimensions of Stressful Events Rating Scale
Traumatology, December 1, 2008; 14(4): 116 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
M. Fichman and J. N. Cummings
Multiple Imputation for Missing Data: Making the most of What you Know
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2003; 6(3): 282 - 308.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. A. Mcdonald, P. W. Thurston, and M. R. Nelson
A Monte Carlo Study of Missing Item Methods
Organizational Research Methods, January 1, 2000; 3(1): 71 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]