Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcdonald, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Monte Carlo Study of Missing Item Methods

Robert A. Mcdonald

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Paul W. Thurston

Air Force Institute of Technology

Mark R. Nelson

The Hunter Group

A Monte Carlo simulation methodology was used to examine the effectiveness of five methods for handling missing data in items that comprise summated scales: listwise deletion, item mean substitution, person mean substitution, random number substitution, and regression imputation. Overall, regression imputation was the most effective method in reproducing psychometric properties of a summated scale and preserving statistical power to detect correlations between the summated scale and other variables. The item mean substitution method yielded biased estimates of the standard deviation of the summated scale. Although list- wise deletion yielded relatively unbiased estimates of the psychometric properties of the summated scale, there were high levels of dispersion in the estimates around the true population values. Furthermore, listwise deletion led to severe reductions in statistical power to detect correlations between the summated scale and other variables.

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 3, No. 1, 71-92 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/109442810031003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Career DevelopmentHome page
N. Z. Hampton
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form in Chinese High School Students
Journal of Career Development, December 1, 2006; 33(2): 142 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]