This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Landis, R. S. Articles by Dunlap, W. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Moderated Multiple Regression Tests are Criterion Specific

William P. Dunlap

Tulane University

This article examines how the ordering of variables impacts conclusions regarding the presence of a significant interactive relationship in moderated multiple regression (MMR). It is argued that whenever the designation of a criterion is arbitrary, researchers should consider performing two MMR analyses: one in which y is treated as the criterion, x the predictor, and m the moderator and a second in which x is the criterion and y the predictor. An example illustrates that these analyses are not symmetrical and that a significant interaction may be observed in one case but not the other. A simulation further illustrates conditions under which such effects are likely to occur. Implications for researchers studying interactions are discussed.

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 3, No. 3, 254-266 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/109442810033003


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. B. Detienne, D. H. Detienne, and S. A. Joshi Neural Networks as Statistical Tools for Business Researchers Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2003; 6(2): 236 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]