Organizational Research Methods

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 3, No. 3, 267-284 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/109442810033004

Factor Analysis of Importance Ratings in Job Analysis: Note on the Misinterpretation of Cranny and Doherty (1988)

Jeff W. Johnson

Personnel Decisions Research Institutes, Inc.

An article by Cranny and Doherty has inadvertently created a common perception among researchers that factor analysis should never be applied to importance ratings collected in a job analysis. The author argues that factor analysis of job analysis importance ratings is appropriate under the following conditions: (a) meaningful differences exist between jobs or positions analyzed, (b) each variable has some interrater agreement within jobs and some variance across jobs or positions, and (c) the research objective is to find a set of factors that reflect shared patterns of the extent to which the tasks, behaviors, or characteristics are relevant to different positions. Illustrative examples are presented of situations in which within-job correlations and variances have little effect on the factor structure across jobs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?