Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karren, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Barringer, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Review and Analysis of the Policy-Capturing Methodology in Organizational Research: Guidelines for Research and Practice

Ronald J. Karren

University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Melissa Woodard Barringer

University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Policy-capturing has been employed extensively in the past to examine how organizational decision makers use the information available to them when making evaluative judgments. The purpose of this article is to provide researchers with guidelines for enhancing the reliability and validity of their studies. More specifically, the authors identify issues researchers may want to consider when designing such studies and offer suggestions for effectively addressing them. They draw on a review of 37 articles from 5 major journals to identify "best practice" and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of alternative approaches to resolving the various issues. The key issues are (a) the realism of the approach and its effect on both internal and external validity, (b) the limits of the full factorial design, (c) the need for orthogonal cues, (d) sample size and statistical power, and (e) the assessment of reliability. The analysis also includes comparisons with conjoint analysis, a similar methodology used in the marketing research literature.

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 5, No. 4, 337-361 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/109442802237115


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
A. Van Gils and P. S. Zwart
Alliance Formation Motives in SMEs: An Explorative Conjoint Analysis Study
International Small Business Journal, February 1, 2009; 27(1): 5 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
J. E. Slaughter, E. M. Richard, and J. H. Martin
Comparing the Efficacy of Policy-Capturing Weights and Direct Estimates for Predicting Job Choice
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2006; 9(3): 285 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
L. Aiman-Smith, S. E. Scullen, and S. H. Barr
Conducting Studies of Decision Making in Organizational Contexts: A Tutorial for Policy-Capturing and Other Regression-Based Techniques
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2002; 5(4): 388 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]