This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schaffer, B. S. Articles by Riordan, C. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Review of Cross-Cultural Methodologies for Organizational Research: A Best- Practices Approach

University of Georgia

Christine M. Riordan

University of Georgia

Cross-cultural studies that use self-report instruments can present researchers with a variety of challenges. This article reviews the organizational research literature between the years of 1995 and 2001 to identify common practices prevalent in this type of research. Key methodological issues are examined within the context of a three-stage framework: (a) the development of the research question, (b) the alignment of the research contexts, and (c) the validation of the research instruments. This examination serves as a basis for the identification of best-practice recommendations for cross-cultural researchers.

Key Words: cross-cultural • organizational studies • methods • best practices

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 6, No. 2, 169-215 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428103251542


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Gerhart Cross Cultural Management Research: Assumptions, Evidence, and Suggested Directions International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, December 1, 2008; 8(3): 259 - 274. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Tsui, S. S. Nifadkar, and Amy Yi Ou Cross-National, Cross-Cultural Organizational Behavior Research: Advances, Gaps, and Recommendations Journal of Management, June 1, 2007; 33(3): 426 - 478. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. MacNab, R. Brislin, R. Worthley, B. L. Galperin, S. Jenner, T. R. Lituchy, J. MacLean, G. M. Aguilera, E. Ravlin, J. H. Tiessen, et al. Culture and Ethics Management: Whistle-blowing and Internal Reporting within a NAFTA Country Context International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2007; 7(1): 5 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. W. Stening and M. Y. Zhang Methodological Challenges Confronted when Conducting Management Research in China International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2007; 7(1): 121 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Yeganeh and Z. Su Conceptual Foundations of Cultural Management Research International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, December 1, 2006; 6(3): 361 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A. Gelade, P. Dobson, and P. Gilbert National Differences In Organizational Commitment: Effect of Economy, Product of Personality, or Consequence of Culture? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, September 1, 2006; 37(5): 542 - 556. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A.-W. Harzing Does the Use of English-language Questionnaires in Cross-national Research Obscure National Differences? International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, August 1, 2005; 5(2): 213 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. W. Cheung, K. F. Murrmann, S. K. Murrmann, and C. Becker Noninvariant Measurement Versus Traditional Approaches for Studying Cultural Differences: A Case of Service Expectations Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, November 1, 2004; 28(4): 375 - 390. [Abstract] [PDF]