This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Slaughter, J. E. Articles by Martin, J. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparing the Efficacy of Policy-Capturing Weights and Direct Estimates for Predicting Job Choice

University of Arizona

Erin M. Richard

Florida Institute of Technology

James H. Martin

University of Missouri–Rolla

When studying applicants' job attribute preferences, researchers have used either direct estimates (DE) of importance or regression-derived statistical weights from policy-capturing (PC) studies. Although each methodology has been criticized, no research has examined the efficacy of weights derived from either method for predicting choices among job offers. In this study, participants were assigned to either a DE or PC condition, and weights for 14 attribute preferences were derived. Three weeks later, the participants made choices among hypothetical job offers. As predicted, PC weights outperformed DE weights when a noncompensatory strategy was assumed, and DE weights outperformed PC weights when a compensatory strategy was assumed. Implications for researchers' choice of methodology when studying attribute preferences are discussed.

Key Words: policy capturing • recruitment • job choice • research methods

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 9, No. 3, 285-314 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428105279936


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?