This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mo Wang Articles by Bodner, T. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Growth Mixture Modeling

Identifying and Predicting Unobserved Subpopulations With Longitudinal Data

Portland State University, mw{at}pdx.edu

Todd E. Bodner

Portland State University

An important limitation of conventional latent-growth modeling (LGM) is that it assumes that all individuals are drawn from one or more observed populations. However, in many applied-research situations, unobserved subpopulations may exist, and their different latent trajectories may be the focus of research to test theory or to resolve inconsistent prior research findings. Conventional LGM does not help to identify and predict these unobserved subpopulations. This article introduces the growth-mixture modeling (GMM) method for these purposes. Given that GMM handles longitudinal data (i.e., nesting of time observations within individuals) and identifies unobserved subpopulations (i.e., the nesting of individuals within latent classes), GMM can be construed as a multilevel modeling technique. The modeling procedure of GMM is illustrated on a simulated data set. Steps in the modeling process are highlighted and limitations, cautions, recommendations, and extensions of using GMM are discussed. Technical references for additional information are noted throughout.

Key Words: longitudinal data analysis • growth curves • growth-mixture modeling

References

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 19, 716—723.[CrossRef]
• Bentler, P.M., & Chou, C.H. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78—117.[Abstract]
• Bhaskar-Shrinivas, P., Harrison, D.A., Shaffer, M.A., & Luk, D.M. (2005). Input-based and time-based models of international adjustment: Meta-analytic evidence and theoretical extensions. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 257-281.[Web of Science]
• Biesanz, J.C., Deeb-Sossa, N., Papadakis, A.A., Bollen, K.A., & Curran, J.C. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9, 30—52.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Black, J.S., & Mendenhall, M. (1991). Cross-cultural training effectiveness: A review and a theoretical framework for future research. Academy of Management Review, 15, 113—136.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Bollen, K.A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 256—259.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Calasanti, T.M. (1996). Gender and life satisfaction in retirement: An assessment of the male model. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 51B, S18—S29.[Abstract]
• Chan, D. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1, 421—483.[Abstract]
• Chan, D. (2001). Latent growth modeling. In F. Drasgow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations (pp. 302—349). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (2000). Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 190—210.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Chou, C., Bentler, P.M., & Pentz, M.A. (1998). Comparisons of two statistical approaches to study growth curves: The multilevel model and the latent curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 247—266.
• Curran, P.J. (2003). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529—569.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S.C., Strycker, L.A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Fan, X. ( 2003). Power of latent growth modeling for detecting group differences in linear growth trajectory parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 380—400.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Gall, T.L., Evans, D.R., & Howard, J. (1997). The retirement adjustment process: Changes in the well-being of male retirees across time. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 52B, P110—P117.[Abstract]
• Garst, H., Frese, M., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (2000). The temporal factor of change in stressor-strain relationships: A growth curve model on a longitudinal study in East Germany. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 417—438.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Greenbaum, P.E., Del Boca, F.K., Darkes, J., Wang, C., & Goldman, M.S. (2005). Variation in the drinking trajectories of freshman college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,73, 229—238.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Hair, J., & Black, W. (2000). Cluster analysis. In L. Grimm & P. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 147—206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424—453.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1—55.
• Jedidi, K., Ramaswamy, V., & Desarbo, W.S. (1993). A maximum likelihood method for latent class regression involving a censored dependent variable. Psychometrika, 58, 375—394.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Juster, F., & Suzman, R. (1995). The health and retirement study: An overview. Journal of Human Resources, 30 (Suppl.), 7—56.[CrossRef]
• Kim, J.E., & Moen, P. (2002). Retirement transitions, gender, and psychological well-being: A life-course, ecological model. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B, P212—P222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Little, R.J., & Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley & Sons.
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N.R., & Rubin, D.B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767—778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• MacCallum, R., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490—504.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391—410.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Matthews, A.M., & Brown, K.H. (1987). Retirement as a critical life event: The differential experiences of women and men. Research on Aging, 9, 548—571.[Abstract]
• McLachlan, G.J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: John Wiley.
• Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107—122.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Murphy, K.R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Human Performance, 2, 183—200.[CrossRef]
• Muthén, B. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class-latent growth modeling. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 291—322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345—368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Muthén, B., Brown, C.H., Masyn, K., Jo, B., Khoo, S.T., Yang, C.C., et al. (2002). General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics, 3, 459—475.[Abstract]
• Muthén, B., Jo, B., & Brown, H. (2003). Comment on the Barnard, Frangakis, Hill, & Rubin article, Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 311—314.[Web of Science]
• Muthén, L. & Muthén, B. (2001). Mplus User's Guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
• Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2004). Mplus (Version 3.1) [Computer software] Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
• Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463—469.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Ployhart, R.E., & Hakel, M.D. (1998). The substantive nature of performance variability: Predicting interindividual differences in intraindividual performance. Personnel Psychology, 51, 859—901.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Ross, C.E., & Drentea, P. (1998). Consequences of retirement activities for distress and the sense of personal control. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 39, 317—334.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461—464.
• Sclove, S.L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333—343.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Wang, M. (2005). Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: Examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees' psychological well-being. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
• Wang, M., Hakel, M., Whinghter, L.J., Liao, F., & Liang, J. (2005). Examining different types of work experience on expatriate longitudinal performance. Poster presented at the 20th annual Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology conference, Los Angeles, CA.
• Willett, J.B., & Sayer, A.G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363—381.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Yang, C. (1998). Finite mixture model selection with psychometric applications. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

This version was published on October 1, 2007

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 10, No. 4, 635-656 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428106289397


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Ram and K. J. Grimm Methods and Measures: Growth mixture modeling: A method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups International Journal of Behavioral Development, November 1, 2009; 33(6): 565 - 576. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mo Wang Articles by Bodner, T. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?