Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doty, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Glick, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results?

D. Harold Doty

Syracuse University

William H. Glick

Arizona State University

Methods variance and its effects are at the center of a debate in organizational science. Most of the debate, however, is focused on the prevalence of common methods variance and ignores common methods bias, or the divergence between observed and true relationships among constructs. This article assesses the level of common methods bias in all multitrait-multimethod correlation matrices published over a 12-year period in a set of six social science journals using a combination of structural equation modeling and meta-analysis. The results indicate that only 46% of the variation in measures is attributable to the constructs, that 32% of the observed variation in measures is attributable to common methods variance, and that common methods variance results in a 26% bias in the observed relationships among constructs. This level of bias is cause for concern but does not invalidate many research findings.

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 1, No. 4, 374-406 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/109442819814002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
H. A. Richardson, M. J. Simmering, and M. C. Sturman
A Tale of Three Perspectives: Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Correction of Common Method Variance
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2009; 12(4): 762 - 800.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
W. Zhu, B. J. Avolio, and F. O. Walumbwa
Moderating Role of Follower Characteristics With Transformational Leadership and Follower Work Engagement
Group Organization Management, October 1, 2009; 34(5): 590 - 619.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Small Group ResearchHome page
C. M. J. H. Savelsbergh, B. I. J. M. van der Heijden, and R. F. Poell
The Development and Empirical Validation of a Multidimensional Measurement Instrument for Team Learning Behaviors
Small Group Research, October 1, 2009; 40(5): 578 - 607.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
L. M. Prati, Yongmei Liu, P. L. Perrewe, and G. R. Ferris
Emotional Intelligence as Moderator of the Surface Acting--Strain Relationship
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, May 1, 2009; 15(4): 368 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Career DevelopmentHome page
K. van Dam, J. D. M. van der Vorst, and B. I. J. M. van der Heijden
Employees' Intentions to Retire Early: A Case of Planned Behavior and Anticipated Work Conditions
Journal of Career Development, March 1, 2009; 35(3): 265 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
C. C. Rosen, K. J. Harris, and K. M. Kacmar
The emotional implications of organizational politics: A process model
Human Relations, January 1, 2009; 62(1): 27 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
T. Golden
Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions
Human Relations, November 1, 2007; 60(11): 1641 - 1667.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
S. D. Barbosa, M. W. Gerhardt, and J. R. Kickul
The Role of Cognitive Style and Risk Preference on Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intentions
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, May 1, 2007; 13(4): 86 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
J. W. Breland, D. C. Treadway, A. B. Duke, and G. L. Adams
The Interactive Effect of Leader-Member Exchange and Political Skill on Subjective Career Success
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, February 1, 2007; 13(3): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
S. Jayachandran and R. Varadarajan
Does Success Diminish Competitive Responsiveness? Reconciling Conflicting Perspectives
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, July 1, 2006; 34(3): 284 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
P. E. Spector
Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend?
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2006; 9(2): 221 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Public Adm Res TheoryHome page
D. P. Moynihan and S. K. Pandey
Testing How Management Matters in an Era of Government by Performance Management
J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., July 1, 2005; 15(3): 421 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
J. Kendall, M. C. Leo, N. Perrin, and D. Hatton
Modeling ADHD Child and Family Relationships
West J Nurs Res, June 1, 2005; 27(4): 500 - 518.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. L. Noble, L. T. Eby, A. Lockwood, and T. D. Allen
Attitudes toward Working Single Parents: Initial Development of a Measure
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2004; 64(6): 1030 - 1052.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
M. E. McLaughlin, M. P. Bell, and D. Y. Stringer
Stigma and Acceptance of Persons With Disabilities: Understudied Aspects of Workforce Diversity
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2004; 29(3): 302 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
L. J. Williams, J. R. Edwards, and R. J. Vandenberg
Recent Advances in Causal Modeling Methods for Organizational and Management Research
Journal of Management, December 1, 2003; 29(6): 903 - 936.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceHome page
E. Babakus, U. Yavas, O. M. Karatepe, and T. Avci
The Effect of Management Commitment to Service Quality on Employees' Affective and Performance Outcomes
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, July 1, 2003; 31(3): 272 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
C. E. Lance, M. J. Kavanagh, and K. E. Brink
Retraining Climate as a Predictor of Retraining Success and as a Moderator of the Relationship between Cross-Job Retraining Time Estimates and Time to Proficiency in the New Job
Group Organization Management, June 1, 2002; 27(2): 294 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism ResearchHome page
A. M. Susskind, C. P. Borchgrevink, R. A. Brymer, and K. M. Kacmar
Customer Service Behavior and Attitudes among Hotel Managers: A Look at Perceived Support Functions, Standards for Service, and Service Process Outcomes
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, August 1, 2000; 24(3): 373 - 397.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Communication ResearchHome page
A. M. SUSSKIND
Efficacy and Outcome Expectations Related to Customer Complaints About Service Experiences
Communication Research, June 1, 2000; 27(3): 353 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human RelationsHome page
B. E. Ashforth and A. M. Saks
Personal Control in Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation with Newcomers
Human Relations, March 1, 2000; 53(3): 311 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
C. P. Parker
A Test of Alternative Hierarchical Models of Psychological Climate: PCg, Satisfaction, or Common Method Variance?
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 1999; 2(3): 257 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
S. E. Scullen
Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Correlated Uniquenesses to Estimate Method Variance in Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 1999; 2(3): 275 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]