Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1094428106295503v1
11/3/562    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riordan, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wayne, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

A Review and Examination of Demographic Similarity Measures Used to Assess Relational Demography Within Groups

Christine M. Riordan1* and Julie Holliday Wayne2

1 Texas Christian University
2 Wake Forest University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: c.riordan{at}tcu.edu.


   Abstract
Relational demography within groups, or an individual’s demographic similarity to a group, is a type of cross-level theory labeled as an individual-within-the-group model. Previous researchers used three different approaches for measuring the core construct of demographic similarity: the difference score, interaction term, and perceptual approaches. This article provides an in-depth review of the measurement definition, conceptual properties, and limitations of each approach, highlighting similarities and differences among them. Then, the authors use data from four financial service organizations to demonstrate that the three measures minimally relate to one another and differentially relate to work outcomes. Although researchers often use the three measures interchangeably, this article suggests that they assess distinct components of the demographic similarity construct or measure the construct with differing degrees of success. Based on the review, the authors offer best-practice guidelines for researchers as to how to use each approach most effectively.

First published on August 13, 2007, doi:10.1177/1094428106295503

Organizational Research Methods 2008;11:562.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?