Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1094428107300343v1
11/2/296    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheung, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Lau, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Testing Mediation and Suppression Effects of Latent Variables: Bootstrapping With Structural Equation Models

Gordon W. Cheung1* and Rebecca S. Lau2

1 The Chinese University of Hong Kong
2 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gordonc{at}cuhk.edu.hk.


   Abstract
Because of the importance of mediation studies, researchers have been continuously searching for the best statistical test for mediation effect. The approaches that have been most commonly employed include those that use zero-order and partial correlation, hierarchical regression models, and structural equation modeling (SEM). This study extends MacKinnon and colleagues (MacKinnon, Lockwood, Hoffmann, West, & Sheets, 2002; MacKinnon, Lockwood, & Williams, 2004, MacKinnon, Warsi, & Dwyer, 1995) works by conducting a simulation that examines the distribution of mediation and suppression effects of latent variables with SEM, and the properties of confidence intervals developed from eight different methods. Results show that SEM provides unbiased estimates of mediation and suppression effects, and that the bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals perform best in testing for mediation and suppression effects. Steps to implement the recommended procedures with Amos are presented.

First published on July 23, 2007, doi:10.1177/1094428107300343

Organizational Research Methods 2008;11:296.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
Z. Zhang, M. J. Zyphur, and K. J. Preacher
Testing Multilevel Mediation Using Hierarchical Linear Models: Problems and Solutions
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2009; 12(4): 695 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
H. A. Richardson, M. J. Simmering, and M. C. Sturman
A Tale of Three Perspectives: Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Correction of Common Method Variance
Organizational Research Methods, October 1, 2009; 12(4): 762 - 800.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Res MethodsHome page
M. W.-L. Cheung
Comparison of methods for constructing confidence intervals of standardized indirect effects
Behav Res Methods, May 1, 2009; 41(2): 425 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc SciHome page
Y. Jang and D. A. Chiriboga
Living in a Different World: Acculturative Stress Among Korean American Elders
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, April 3, 2009; (2009) gbp019v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
D. A. Kenny
Reflections on Mediation
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 353 - 358.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
J. E. Mathieu, R. P. DeShon, and D. D. Bergh
Mediational Inferences in Organizational Research: Then, Now, and Beyond
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2008; 11(2): 203 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]