This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1094428108315864v1 12/3/529    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rivers, D. C. Articles by Fuller, W. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Examining Question and Context Effects in Organization Survey Data Using Item Response Theory

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: awmeade{at}ncsu.edu.

	Abstract

Organizational researchers routinely use attitudinal surveys to track organizational development and identify areas for intervention. However, seemingly trivial changes to the survey instrument, such as question wording or question order, can introduce measurement artifacts leading to differences in observed responses that are not due to actual employee attitudinal change. Traditional methods for assessing the presence of artifacts because of survey changes require additional survey administration using multiple survey forms and random assignment. However, the item response theory method illustrated in this study eliminates the need for additional data collection, offers a more rigorous design, and requires fewer organizational resources.

First published on March 4, 2008, doi:10.1177/1094428108315864

Organizational Research Methods 2009;12:529.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?