Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Organizational Research Methods
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (70)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayton, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Scarpello, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis

James C. Hayton

Utah State University

David G. Allen

University of Memphis

Vida Scarpello

University of Florida

The decision of how many factors to retain is a critical component of exploratory factor analysis. Evidence is presented that parallel analysis is one of the most accurate factor retention methods while also being one of the most underutilized in management and organizational research. Therefore, a step-by-step guide to performing parallel analysis is described, and an example is provided using data from the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Recommendations for making factor retention decisions are discussed.

Key Words: exploratory factor analysis • parallel analysis • factor retention decisions

Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 7, No. 2, 191-205 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1094428104263675


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AssessmentHome page
L. Dindo, E. McDade-Montez, L. Sharma, D. Watson, and L. A. Clark
Development and Initial Validation of the Disinhibition Inventory: A Multifaceted Measure of Disinhibition
Assessment, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 274 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
G. Bjornebekk
Psychometric Properties of the Scores on the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scales in a Sample of Norwegian Children
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2009; 69(4): 636 - 654.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and DevelopmentHome page
C. W. Koth, C. P. Bradshaw, and P. J. Leaf
Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation--Checklist: Development and Factor Structure
Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, April 1, 2009; 42(1): 15 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
S. de Cassia Martinelli, D. Bartholomeu, S. Gakyia Caliatto, and A. de Grecci Sassi
Children's Self-Efficacy Scale: Initial Psychometric Studies
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, April 1, 2009; 27(2): 145 - 156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
H. van Mierlo, J. K. Vermunt, and C. G. Rutte
Composing Group-Level Constructs From Individual-Level Survey Data
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 368 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
K. M. Kieffer and R. J. Reese
Measurement of Test and Study Worry and Emotionality in College Students: A Psychometric Evaluation of the Test and Study Attitudes Inventory
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2009; 69(2): 303 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
S. R. Doyle, D. A. Calsyn, and S. A. Ball
Factor Structure of the Condoms Barriers Scale With a Sample of Men at High Risk for HIV
Assessment, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 3 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
T. L. Rodebaugh, R. M. Holaway, and R. G. Heimberg
The Factor Structure and Dimensional Scoring of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire for DSM-IV
Assessment, September 1, 2008; 15(3): 343 - 350.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
A. Gregoriadis and N. Tsigilis
Applicability of the Student--Teacher Relationship Scale (STRS) in the Greek Educational Setting
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 2008; 26(2): 108 - 120.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
S. L. Rizvi, D. Kaysen, C. A. Gutner, M. G. Griffin, and P. A. Resick
Beyond Fear: The Role of Peritraumatic Responses in Posttraumatic Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among Female Crime Victims
J Interpers Violence, June 1, 2008; 23(6): 853 - 868.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav Res MethodsHome page
O. L. LIU and F. RIJMEN
A modified procedure for parallel analysis of ordered categorical data
Behav Res Methods, May 1, 2008; 40(2): 556 - 562.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Service ResearchHome page
M. S. Rosenbaum, J. Ward, B. A. Walker, and A. L. Ostrom
A Cup of Coffee With a Dash of Love: An Investigation of Commercial Social Support and Third-Place Attachment
Journal of Service Research, August 1, 2007; 10(1): 43 - 59.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and D. DeWayne Moore
Development of a Theory-Based Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2007; 67(3): 505 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organizational Research MethodsHome page
C. E. Lance, M. M. Butts, and L. C. Michels
The Sources of Four Commonly Reported Cutoff Criteria: What Did They Really Say?
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2006; 9(2): 202 - 220.
[Abstract] [PDF]